authzed/spicedb · Security

SpiceDB checks involving relations with caveats can result in no permission when permission is expected

GHSA ID
GHSA-cwwm-hr97-qfxm
CVE ID
CVE-2025-49011
Severity
low
Published
Updated
CVSS
3.7 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS v3
3.7 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Description

Impact

On schemas involving arrows with caveats on the arrow’ed relation, when the path to resolve a CheckPermission request involves the evaluation of multiple caveated branches, requests may return a negative response when a positive response is expected.

For example, given this schema:

definition user {}

definition office {
	relation parent: office
	relation manager: user
	permission read = manager + parent->read
}

definition group {
	relation parent: office
	permission read = parent->read
}

definition document {
	relation owner: group with equals
	permission read = owner->read
}

caveat equals(actual string, required string) {
	actual == required
}

and these relationships:

office:headoffice#manager@user:maria
office:branch1#parent@office:headoffice
group:admins#parent@office:branch1
group:managers#parent@office:headoffice
document:budget#owner@group:admins[equals:{"required":"admin"}]
document:budget#owner@group:managers[equals:{"required":"manager"}]

Permission for 'document:budget#read@user:maria with {"actual" : "admin"}' is returned as NO_PERMISSION when HAS_PERMISSION is the correct answer.

Patches

Upgrade to v1.44.2.

Workarounds

Do not use caveats in your schema over an arrow’ed relation.

CWEs

References