miraheze/tsportal · Security

TSPortal's Uncontrolled User Creation via Validation Side Effects Leads to Potential Denial of Service

GHSA ID
GHSA-f346-8rp3-4h9h
CVE ID
CVE-2026-33541
Severity
medium
Published
Updated
CVSS
6.5 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS v3
6.5 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Description

Summary

A flaw in TSPortal allowed attackers to create arbitrary user records in the database by abusing validation logic. While validation correctly rejected invalid usernames, a side effect within a validation rule caused user records to be created regardless of whether the request succeeded. This could be exploited to cause uncontrolled database growth, leading to a potential denial of service (DoS).

Details

When submitting a Data Processing Agreement (DPA) request in TSPortal, the DPAAlreadyLive validation rule previously called User::findOrCreate().

This method created a user record if one did not already exist.

Although username validation (via MirahezeUsernameRule) correctly rejected invalid usernames, the DPAAlreadyLive rule was still executed during validation. Because it performed a state-changing operation, it created user records even when the overall validation failed and no DPA was created.

As a result:

  • Validation correctly rejected invalid input
  • However, user records were still inserted into the database as a side effect

These records were created:

  • Without a successful DPA request
  • Without audit logging tied to a completed action
  • Without visibility into their origin

Impact

An attacker could exploit this behavior by automating requests with invalid usernames, resulting in:

  • Mass creation of arbitrary user records
  • Unbounded database growth
  • Increased storage and indexing overhead
  • Potential degradation of application performance

At scale, this could lead to a denial of service condition due to resource exhaustion.

Proof of Concept

  1. Submit a DPA request using an invalid username
  2. Ensure the request fails validation due to MirahezeUsernameRule
  3. Observe that a corresponding user record is still created in the database

This behavior was confirmed prior to remediation.

Root Cause

The issue stemmed from:

  • Performing state-changing operations (findOrCreate) inside validation logic
  • Validation rules executing regardless of overall validation success
  • Lack of separation between validation and persistence layers

Mitigation

The issue has been fixed by removing database write operations from validation logic.

Specifically:

  • Replaced User::findOrCreate() with a non-mutating lookup (User::firstWhere(...))
  • Ensured validation rules only perform read operations
  • Prevented user creation unless all validation passes

CWEs

References