rabbitmq/rabbitmq-java-client · Security

RabbitMQ Java client: Unvalidated Class.forName in JSON-RPC ProcedureDescription enables arbitrary class loading

GHSA ID
GHSA-6g32-pxv4-2wfj
CVE ID
CVE-2026-63337
Severity
high
Published
Updated
CVSS v4
7.5 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L

Description

The JSON-RPC tools in com.rabbitmq.tools.jsonrpc perform Class.forName(javaReturnType) with initialize=true on class names received from untrusted AMQP messages, without any validation or allowlist.

Vulnerable code (ProcedureDescription.java:101-127): When a JsonRpcClient connects, it calls system.describe and receives a service description from the AMQP queue. The response JSON includes javaReturnType fields that are reflectively set via JSONUtil.tryFill(), triggering setJavaReturnType() → computeReturnTypeAsJavaClass() → Class.forName(javaReturnType).

Attack scenario:

  1. Victim uses JsonRpcClient to connect to a JSON-RPC service via RabbitMQ
  2. Attacker (co-tenant on shared broker, or MITM) intercepts the system.describe request
  3. Attacker responds with crafted javaReturnType values
  4. Victim's client calls Class.forName(attackerInput) with default initialize=true
  5. Static initializers of attacker-specified classes execute in victim's JVM

Additionally, the loaded class from getReturnType() is passed to mapper.parse(replyStr, expectedType) at JsonRpcClient.java:168, potentially enabling type-confusion.

Recommended fix: Use Class.forName(javaReturnType, false, classLoader) to prevent static initializer execution, or add an allowlist of permitted return types.

CWE: CWE-470


Reply from reporter (2026-06-29): Thanks for the quick turnaround. Fix looks good. Looking forward to the CVE assignment.

CWEs

References