vyperlang/vyper · Security
Incorrect success value returned in vyper
- GHSA ID
- GHSA-w9g2-3w7p-72g9
- CVE ID
- CVE-2023-30629
- Severity
- high
- Published
- Updated
- CVSS
- 7.5 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
- CVSS v3
- 7.5 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
- CVSS v4
- 8.7 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Description
Background
During the audit of Lido's Gate Seals code statemind team identified a weird behavior of the code that uses raw_call: https://github.com/lidofinance/gate-seals/blob/051593e74df01a4131c485b4fda52e691cd4b7d8/contracts/GateSeal.vy#L164 .
Construction like this:
success = raw_call(
sealable,
_abi_encode(SEAL_DURATION_SECONDS, method_id=method_id("pauseFor(uint256)")),
revert_on_failure=False
)
was not fully documented: https://docs.vyperlang.org/en/v0.3.7/built-in-functions.html#raw_call .
The documentation says that: if max_outsize=0 it should return nothing and then it says that if revert_on_failure=False it should return a success flag in the tuple of response, but what if max_outsize=0 and revert_on_failure=False.
So the team started researching what exactly happened in that case, after some research we found that the Vyper compiler generates the wrong bytecode in that case, it generates the sequence:
CALL // call
MLOAD // MLOAD is wrong since the CALL result is already stored in the stack
Impact
Example of buggy code:
@external
def returnSome(calling: address, a: uint256) -> bool:
success: bool = false
success = raw_call(
calling,
_abi_encode(a, method_id=method_id("a(uint256)")),
revert_on_failure=False
)
any contract that uses the raw_call with revert_on_failure=False and max_outsize=0 receives the wrong response from raw_call. Depending on the memory garbage, the result can be either True or False.
Patches
Fix by @charles-cooper https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/commit/851f7a1b3aa2a36fd041e3d0ed38f9355a58c8ae
Workarounds
The simple workaround is always to put max_outsize>0.
Workaround example https://github.com/lidofinance/gate-seals/pull/5/files
References
Lido's fix: https://github.com/lidofinance/gate-seals/pull/5/files
CWEs
- CWE-670 · Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation
References
- https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-w9g2-3w7p-72g9 ↗
- https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/commit/851f7a1b3aa2a36fd041e3d0ed38f9355a58c8ae ↗
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-30629 ↗
- https://github.com/lidofinance/gate-seals/pull/5/files ↗
- https://docs.vyperlang.org/en/v0.3.7/built-in-functions.html#raw_call ↗
- https://github.com/lidofinance/gate-seals/blob/051593e74df01a4131c485b4fda52e691cd4b7d8/contracts/GateSeal.vy#L164 ↗
- https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/vyper/PYSEC-2023-131.yaml ↗
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-w9g2-3w7p-72g9 ↗