zeroae/zae-limiter · Security
zae-limiter: DynamoDB hot partition throttling enables per-entity Denial of Service
- GHSA ID
- GHSA-76rv-2r9v-c5m6
- CVE ID
- CVE-2026-27695
- Severity
- medium
- Published
- Updated
- CVSS
- 4.3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
- CVSS v3
- 4.3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description
Summary
All rate limit buckets for a single entity share the same DynamoDB partition key (namespace/ENTITY#{id}). A high-traffic entity can exceed DynamoDB's per-partition throughput limits (~1,000 WCU/sec), causing throttling that degrades service for that entity — and potentially co-located entities in the same partition.
Details
Each acquire() call performs a TransactWriteItems (or UpdateItem in speculative mode) against items sharing the same partition key. For cascade entities, this doubles to 2-4 writes per request (child + parent). At sustained rates above ~500 req/sec for a single entity, DynamoDB's adaptive capacity may not redistribute fast enough, causing ProvisionedThroughputExceededException.
The library has no built-in mitigation:
- No partition key sharding/salting
- No write coalescing or batching
- No client-side admission control before hitting DynamoDB
RateLimiterUnavailableis raised but the caller has already been delayed
Impact
- Availability: High-traffic entities experience elevated latency and rejected requests beyond what their rate limits specify
- Fairness: Other entities sharing the same DynamoDB partition may experience collateral throttling
- Multi-tenant risk: In a shared LLM proxy scenario, one tenant's burst traffic could degrade service for others
Reproduction
- Create an entity with high rate limits (e.g., 100,000 rpm)
- Send sustained traffic at 1,000+ req/sec to a single entity
- Observe DynamoDB
ThrottledRequestsCloudWatch metric increasing - Observe
acquire()latency spikes andRateLimiterUnavailableexceptions
Remediation Design: Pre-Shard Buckets
- Move buckets to
PK={ns}/BUCKET#{entity}#{resource}#{shard}, SK=#STATE— one partition per (entity, resource, shard) - Auto-inject
wcu:1000reserved limit on every bucket — tracks DynamoDB partition write pressure in-band (name may change during implementation) - Shard doubling (1→2→4→8) triggered by client on
wcuexhaustion or proactively by aggregator - Shard 0 at suffix
#0is source of truth forshard_count. Aggregator propagates to other shards - Original limits stored on bucket, effective limits derived:
original / shard_count. Infrastructure limits (wcu) not divided - Shard selection: random/round-robin. On application limit exhaustion, retry on another shard (max 2 retries)
- Lazy shard creation on first access
- Bucket discovery via GSI3 (KEYS_ONLY) + BatchGetItem. GSI2 for resource aggregation unchanged
- Cascade: parent unaware, protected by own
wcu - Aggregator: parse new PK format, key by shard_id, effective limits for refill, filter
wcufrom snapshots - Clean break migration: schema version bump, old buckets ignored, new buckets created on first access
- $0.625/M preserved on hot path
CWEs
- CWE-770 · Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
References
- https://github.com/zeroae/zae-limiter/security/advisories/GHSA-76rv-2r9v-c5m6 ↗
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-27695 ↗
- https://github.com/zeroae/zae-limiter/commit/481ce44d818d66e31d8837bc48519660ce4c267f ↗
- https://github.com/zeroae/zae-limiter/releases/tag/v0.10.1 ↗
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-76rv-2r9v-c5m6 ↗